Parameterization Framework and Quantification Approach for Integrated Risk and Resilience Assessments. on food systems), as well as increasing urbanization (Liu 2014; Sellberg, Wilkinson & Peterson 2015). River ecosystem resilience risk index: A tool to quantitatively characterize resilience and critical transitions in human-impacted large rivers. Nam mi eros, porta vitae tempus sit amet, blandit non elit. The key lessons that these principles for building resilience provide for the design of resilience metrics and assessment are the importance of considering both static (structural) and dynamic aspects of the system, as well as the resilience of both interventions and the system itself. Methods: Participatory mapping, community discussion, lists and timelines, Community‐based resilience analysis (CoBRA), (UNDP, Quantify results of interventions and measure the ability of households to cope with drought in the Horn of Africa, Sustainable Livelihoods Framework with five categories of capital: human, natural, financial, social and physical. Whereas assessment approaches tend to focus on deepening understanding of system dynamics, resilience measurement aims to capture and quantify resilience in a rigorous and repeatable way. Fit for Purpose Community Mapping in South Africa. Advances in the development of resilience metrics have also come from the field of economics with the application of inclusive wealth measurements as an economic measure of sustainability (Pearson et al. If you do not receive an email within 10 minutes, your email address may not be registered, Mapping Resilience Theory: A Metatheoretical Exploration. While originally developed with natural resource managers as the target user, there are many reasons for undertaking a resilience assessment and the approach is often adapted to suit the context (Liu 2014; Sellberg, Wilkinson & Peterson 2015). The resilience building strategies can be organized along two axes, the first, according to whether they primarily focus on the resilience of a social‐ecological system or on the resilience of its governance, and the second, whether the focus emphasizes system structure or dynamics (Fig. responsiveness, capacity to learn) and institutions (e.g. Ecological resilience thus assumes that a system has multiple alternate equilibria and focuses on the capacity of a system to maintain, including through reorganization, its essential structure and function when confronted with shocks. To be effective, measuring resilience should adopt an iterative and ongoing approach, as is recommended for resilience assessment. Resilience, however, as a property of complex adaptive systems, does not lend itself easily to measurement. This study assessed the resilience of coral communities in two different regions of the Florida Keys reef system between 1998 and 2002 following hurricane impacts and coral bleaching in 1998. Donec ullamcorper vulputate quam pharetra tempus. 2012) as mentioned in the section above is one such approach that considers endogenous dynamics. Measuring resilience over time against a baseline as a function of the change in livelihood and environmental variables acknowledges the importance of cross‐scale temporal dynamics. Decades of research on resilience in social‐ecological systems have identified a number of strategies for building and enhancing resilience. For example, the emergence of the Human Development Index (HDI) involved a process of simplifying the complex outcome of human well‐being. There are lessons to draw from measurement approaches taken by other fields dealing with complexity. Challenges in Riverine Ecosystem Management. Resilience is a process and can be learned by anyone using positive emotions, Resilience Assessment Workbook for Practitioners (Resilience Alliance, Understand resource issues from a complex system's perspective and develop strategic management goals, Modules: system boundaries, system dynamics, interactions, adaptive governance, acting on the assessment.